AI writes the code. You still need to review it.
GitHub Copilot helps developers write code faster with AI suggestions and code completion. Axiomo helps reviewers evaluate PRs - including those written with Copilot - by providing contributor context, risk signals, and governance checks. Copilot accelerates code creation; Axiomo ensures what gets merged is trustworthy.
Copilot and similar AI tools have fundamentally changed how code is written. Developers ship more code, faster. But this creates a new problem:
| Capability | GitHub Copilot | Axiomo |
|---|---|---|
| Code completion | Yes | No |
| Code generation from prompts | Yes | No |
| Contributor intelligence | No | Yes |
| PR risk scoring | No | Yes |
| Policy enforcement | No | Yes |
| Sensitive path detection | No | Yes |
| Review focus recommendations | No | Yes |
Copilot and Axiomo are complementary. Your team can use Copilot to write code faster, then use Axiomo to review it effectively:
Use Copilot to get suggestions, generate boilerplate, and ship features faster.
Use Axiomo to understand who's making changes, what's at risk, and where to focus your review.
GitHub Copilot helps you write code. Axiomo helps you decide what code to merge. In a world where AI can generate code faster than humans can review it, you need both: tools that accelerate creation and tools that ensure quality control. They're not competitors - they're two halves of the modern development workflow.
Analyze any public PR in seconds