Different problems, complementary solutions.
Graphite optimizes the PR author experience - stacked PRs, faster merges, better workflow for shipping code. Axiomo optimizes the PR reviewer experience - contributor context, risk signals, and governance for deciding what to merge. They solve different halves of the same problem.
Built for PR authors who want to ship faster. Stacked PRs, merge queues, CLI workflow, and team velocity metrics.
Built for PR reviewers who need context. Contributor intelligence, risk scoring, policy enforcement, and governance.
| Feature | Graphite | Axiomo |
|---|---|---|
| Stacked PRs | Yes | No |
| Merge queue | Yes | No |
| CLI workflow | Yes | Yes |
| Contributor intelligence | No | Yes |
| Risk scoring | No | Yes |
| Policy enforcement | No | Yes |
| Sensitive path detection | No | Yes |
| Focus file recommendations | No | Yes |
| Team velocity metrics | Yes | No |
| Multi-provider support | GitHub only | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket |
Graphite and Axiomo solve different problems in the PR lifecycle. You can use both:
Use Graphite to create stacked PRs, manage your workflow, and get code merged faster.
Use Axiomo to understand who's making changes, what's at risk, and where to focus your review.
Graphite makes PRs easier to create and ship. Axiomo makes PRs easier to review and trust. If your bottleneck is getting code out the door, try Graphite. If your bottleneck is knowing whether to approve, try Axiomo. Or use both - they're complementary.
Analyze any public PR in seconds